• Bakker, A., Haidari, A. and Marshall, E.M. (2001). Design Reactors via CFD. CEP Magazine, Fluid Inc., December.

 

• Belafi-Bakó, K. (2006). Effect of operation conditions on the efficiency of membrane bioreactors. Desalination, 200(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 511-513.

 

• Brotherton, J.D. and Chan, P.C. (1996). Modeling of Axial-Flow Hollow Fiber Cell Culture Bioreactors. Biotechnol. Prog., 12(5), 575-590. 

 

• Buscaglia, G.C., Bombardelli, F.A. and García, M.H. (2002). Numerical modeling of large-scale bubble plumes accounting for mass transfer effects. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 28, 1763-1785.

 

• Chang, I-S. and Judd, S.J. (2002). Air sparging of a submerged MBR for municipal wastewater treatment. Process Biochemistry, 37, 915-920.

  

• Chiemchaisri, C. and Yamamoto, K. (1994). Performance of membrane separation bioreactor at various temperatures for domestic wastewater treatment. J. Memb. Sci., 87, 119.

  

• Cote, P., Buisson, H., Pound, C. and Arakaki, G. (1997). Immersed membrane activated sludge for the reuse of municipal wastewater. Desalination, 113, 189.

 

• Curcio, S., Calabro, V. and Iorio, G. (2006). A theoretical and experimental analysis of a membrane bioreactor performance in recycle configuration. J. Mem. Sci., 273(1-2), Engineering with Membranes: Medical and Biological Applications, 129-142.

 

• Delgado, S., Diaz, F., Vera, L., Diaz, R. and Elmaleh, S. (2004). Modelling hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of biologically treated wastewater with and without gas sparging. J. Mem, Sci., 228(1), 55-63.

 

• De Wever, H., Weiss, S., Reemtsma, T., Vereecken, J., Muller, J., Knepper,  T., Rorden, O., Gonzalez, S., Barcelo, D. and Dolores Hernando, M. (2007). Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment. Water Research, 41(4), 935-945.

 

• Do-Quang, Z., Cockx, A., Liné, A. and Roustan, M. (1999). Computational fluid dynamics applied to water and wastewater treatment facility modeling. Environ. Eng. Policy, 1, 137-147.

 

• Durante, F., Di Bella, G., Torregrossa, M. and Viviani, G. (2006). “Particle size distribution and biomass growth in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 493-495.

 

• Espinosa Bouchot, M., Espinasse, B. and Cabassud, C. (2006). Fouling effects and critical flux in relation with module design and aeration conditions for a side stream outside/in filtration system. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 487-489.

 

• Fan, F., Zhou, H. and Husain H. (2006). Identification of wastewater sludge characteristics to predict critical flux for membrane bioreactor processes. Water Research, 40(2), 205-212.

 

• Germain, E., Stephenson, T. and Pearce, P. (2005). Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration: toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Biotechnol. Bioeng., 19(3), 16-22.

 

• Huang, X., Liu, R. and Qian, Y. (2000). Behaviour of soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Proc. Biochem,. 36, 401-406.

 

• Innocenti, L., Bolzonella, D., Pavan, P. and Cecchi, F. (2002). Effect of sludge age on the performance of a membrane bioreactor: influence of nutrient and metals removal. Desalination, 146, 467-474.

 

• Ivanovic, I.; Leiknes, T-O. and Ødegaard, H. (2006). Influence of loading rates on production and characteristics of retentate from a biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 490-492.

 

• Jang, N., Shon, H., Ren, X., Vigneswaran, S. and Kim, I.S. (2006). Characteristics of bio-foulants in the membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 200(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 201-202.

 

• Kang S-T., Subramani, A., Hoek, E.M.V., Deshusses, M.A. and Matsumoto, M.R. (2004). Direct observation of biofouling in cross-flow microfiltration: mechanisms of deposition and release, Journal of Membrane Science. 244 (1-2), 151-165. 

 

• Katayon, S., Megat Mohd Noor, M.J., Ahmad, J., Abdul Ghani, L.A., Nagaoka, H. and Aya, H. (2004). Effects of mixed liquor suspended solid concentrations on membrane bioreactor efficiency for treatment of food industry wastewater. Desalination, 167, 153-158.

 

• Lahey, R.T. and Drew, D.A. (2000). An analysis of two-phase flow and heat transfer using a multidimensional, mult-field, two-fluid computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model. Japan/US Seminar on Two-Phase Flow Dynamics, Santa Barbara, California, 5-8^th June.

 

• Lesjean, B. and Gnirss, R. (2006). Grey water treatment with a membrane bioreactor operated at low SRT and low HRT. Desalination, 199(1.3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 432-434.

  

• Lobos, J., Wisniewski, C., Heran, M. and Grasmick, A. (2006). Membrane bioreactor performances: comparison between continuous and sequencing systems. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 319-321. 

 

•Lu, S.G., Imai, T., Ukita, M., Sekine, M., Higuchi, T. and Fukagawa, M. (2001). A model for membrane bioreactor process based on the concept of formation and degradation of soluble microbial products.Wat. Res., 35, 2038-2048.

 

• Lyko, S., Wintgens, T., Al-Halbouni, D., Dott, W., Baumgarten, S., Tacke, D., Ostrowski, R., Pinnekamp, J., Janot, A. and Melin, T. (2006). World’s largest municipal membrane bioreactor – fouling characterisation and relation to operating performance. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 480-481.

 

• Melin, T., Jefferson, B., Bixio, D., Thoeye, C., De Wilde, W., De Koning, J., van der Graaf J. and Wintgens, T. (2006). Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination, 187(1-3), Integrated Concepts in Water Recycling, 271-282.

 

• Miure, Y., Watanabe, Y. and Okabe, S. (2007). Membrane Biofouling in Pilot-Scale Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) Treating Municipal Wastewater: Impact of Biofilm Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(2), 632-638. 

 

• Nah, H., Kono, S., Yamanish, S., Miya, A. (2000). Influence of organic loading rate on membrane fouling in membrane separation activated sludge process. In Proc. of the IWA Conference of Membrane Technology in Environmental Management, Tóquio, 242.

 

• Negaresh, E., Le-Clech, P. and Chen, V. (2006). Fouling mechanisms of model extracellular polymeric substances in submerged membrane reactor. Desalination, 200(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 715-717. 

 

• Ng, H.Y. and Hermanowicz, S.W. (2005). Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. Water Research, 39(6), 981-992.

 

• Nordin, A-K. and Jonsson,, A-S. (2006). Optimisation of membrane area and energy requirement in tubular membrane modules. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane 2006, 20 November, 94-95.

  
• Ognier, S., Wisniewski, C. and Grasmick, A. (2002). Characterisation and modelling of fouling in membrane bioreactors. Desalination, 146, 141-147.

 

• Padmasiri S.I., Zhang, J., Fitch, M., Norddahl, B., Morgenroth, E., and Raskin, L. (2007). Methanogenic population dynamics and performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating swine manure under high shear conditions. Water Research, 41(1), 134-144.

 

• Parco, V., Wentzel, M. and Ekama, G. (2006). Kinetics of nitrogen removal in a MBR nutrient removal activated sludge system. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane 2006, 20 November, 89-91.

 

• Pollice, A., Saturno, D., Giodarno, C. and Laera, G. (2006). Long term effects of complete sludge retention in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 325-327.

 

• Psoch, C. and Schiewer, S. (2005). Critical flux aspect of air sparging and backflushing on membrane bioreactors. Desalination, 175, 61-71.

 

• Scholz, W.G., Rougé, P., Bódalo, A. and Leitz, U. (2005). Desalination of Mixed Tannery Effluent with Membrane Bioreactor and Reverse Osmosis Treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39(21), 8505-8511. 

 

• Taha, T. and Cui, Z.F. (2002). CFD modelling of gas-sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membranes: J. Mem. Sci., 210(1), 13-27.

 

• Trussel. R.B., Merlo, R.P., Hermanowicz, S.W. and Jenkins, D. (2006). The effect of organic loading on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Water Research, 40(14), 2675-2683. 

 

• Van Kaam, R., Anne-Archard, D., Alliet, M., Lopez, S. and Albasi, C. (2006). Aeration mode, shear stress and sludge rheology in a submerged membrane bioreactor: some keys of energy saving. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 482-484.

 

• Vocks, M., Bracklow, U., Drews, A., Lesjean, B., Mante, J. and Kraume, M. (2006). Comparison of polysaccharide concentration and fouling rates in different membrane activated sludge systems. Desalination, 199(1-3), Euromembrane, 20 November, 381-383.

 

• Wiley, D.E. and Fletcher, D.F. (2003). Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels, J. Memb. Sci., 211(1), 127-137.

 

• Wintgens, T., Rosen, J., Melin, T., Brepols, C., Drensla, K. and Engelhardt, N. (2003). Modelling of a membrane bioreactor system for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Memb. Sci., 216, 55-65.

 

• Wisniewski, C. (2007). Membrane Bioreactors for Water Reuse. Desalination, 203, 15-19.